How is it of relevance?
It is a very comprehensive global classification scheme for buildings, able to capture all different building types that exist around the globe, and it is accompanied by tools that allow you to easily work with the building taxonomy.
It is being used as a basis for the global exposure database and the global consequences database, as well as by the inventory data capture tools, for adding new information on buildings to the OpenQuake platform. But it can be used beyond GEM; it facilitates global collaboration and growth of our joint knowledge on the diversity of seismic vulnerability of all the buildings that exist around the globe.
Who is developing it?
The project is led by Charles Scawthorn and Svetlana Brzev. They have a few fixed collaborators such as Andrew Charleson, Luke Allen, Marjorie Green’s team of the EERI World Housing Encyclopedia and Kishor Jaiswal. Many other experts, structural engineers and others from around the globe have also contributed to the shaping and development of the taxonomy. See also the Building Taxonomy page on GEM Nexus.
See below the list of contributors to the Glossary and the GEM-EERI Building Reports.
The Taxonomy in a nutshell
In addition to being a scheme for classification of buildings worldwide, the GEM Building Taxonomy also allows for creation of a unique description (code) for a building or building typology, based on the 13 different attributes that correspond to specific building characteristics which affect its seismic performance.
The GEM Building Taxonomy consists of:
- 13 main attributes (described in an overview table)
- the different various building characteristics that can be chosen for each attribute (described in 13 attribute-related tables)
- a glossary defining all attributes and building characteristics and illustrating them with pictures and images where possible.
The Building Taxonomy ‘genome’:
- Direction – the orientation of building(s) with different lateral load-resisting systems in two principal horizontal directions of the building plan which are perpendicular to one another
- Material of the lateral load-resisting system - e.g. "masonry" or "wood"
- Lateral load-resisting system - the structural system that provides resistance against horizontal earthquake forces through vertical and horizontal components, e.g. "wall", "moment frame", etc.
- Height - building height above ground in terms of the number of storeys (e.g. a building is 3-storey high); this attribute also includes information on the number of basements (if present) and the ground slope
- Date of construction or retrofit - the year in which the building construction or retrofit was completed
- Occupancy - the type of activity (function) that the building is used for
- Building position within a block - the position of a building within a block of buildings (e.g. a "detached building" is not attached to any other building)
- Shape of the building plan - e.g. L-shape, rectangular shape, etc.
- Structural irregularity - features of a building's structural arrangement that are irregular; such as one story is significantly higher than other stories, or the building has an irregular shape. Also the change of the structural system or materials that produce known vulnerability during an earthquake fall into this category. Re-entrant corner and soft storey are examples.
- Exterior walls - material of exterior walls (building enclosure), e.g. "masonry", "glass", etc.
- Roof - this attribute describes the roof shape, material of the roof covering, structural system supporting the roof covering, and the roof-wall connection. For example, the roof shape may be "pitched with gable ends", roof covering could be "tile", and the roof system may be "wooden roof structure with light infill or covering".
- Floor - describes the floor material, floor system type, and floor-wall connection. For example, the floor material may be "concrete", and the floor system may be "cast in-place beamless reinforced concrete slab".
- Foundation - that part of the construction where the base of the building meets the ground. The foundation transmits loads from the building to the underlying soil. For example, a shallow foundation supports walls and columns in a building for hard soil conditions, and a deep foundation needs to be provided for buildings located in soft soil areas.
What are its characteristics?
- Collapsible. A taxonomy is collapsible if taxonomic groups with different levels of details and significance can be combined and/or compacted and the resulting combinations still distinguish differences in seismic performance, while acknowledging some loss of precision.
- Detailed. The taxonomy includes all features relevant to the seismic performance of a building located anywhere in the world. It aims to capture all aspects of seismic performance and estimation of possible losses for an entire building, including building dimensions and non-structural components.
- Distinguishes differences in seismic performance. The taxonomy distinguishes earthquake-resistant structural systems from non-earthquake resistant systems, including the “before” and “after” states of common seismic retrofits and between “ductile" and "non-ductile” systems.
- Flexible and extensible. All future data needs can’t be foreseen, so the taxonomy lends itself to changes and future extensions – i.e., be ‘growable’, attributes can be modified or added, for example to include new building typologies, and new attributes or characteristics can be added for example to facilitate use in a multi-hazard context.
- International in scope. As far as possible the taxonomy is made appropriate for any region of the world. It does not privilege any one region but aims to be technically and culturally acceptable to all regions.
- User-friendly. The taxonomy is meant to be straightforward, intuitive, and as easy to use as possible by both those collecting data, those arranging for its analysis and all end users.
The Glossary
The team has developed an online glossary which explains more than 380 terms contained in the GEM Building Taxonomy v 2.0, where possible supported by photos or illustrations - over 600 in total. The terms are listed in alphabetical order. Alternatively, any term can be accessed by clicking on its name listed in a taxonomy table. There is a taxonomy table for each of 13 main attribute of the GEM Building Taxonomy, and these can be accessed through the Building Taxonomy page on GEM Nexus.
The technical report together with a PDF version of the Glossary are now available here.
Your feedback and photos
We look forward to your comments and suggestions! You can add comments below each glossary term. We also welcome contributions in terms of the photographs illustrating glossary terms. For more information on how to contribute visit the GEM Building Taxonomy Working Group in Nexus or write to the GEM Building Taxonomy team at buildingtaxonomy@globalquakemodel.org.
Files and Images of GEM Glossary are released under the terms of Creative Commons Attributon 3.0 Unported license CC-BY. This is a license that fits with the spirit of this collaborative effort, and allows others to build on your contribution.
How is it different?
This taxonomy is different from the majority of existing structural taxonomies used for seismic risk assessments; it is seen as the Next Generation Taxonomy (NGT) by its developers. The taxonomy data model is in line with modern Building Information Modelling (BIM) approaches and tools which are being used in the construction industry.
How can I use it?
You can access the latest (preliminary) version of the GEM Building Taxonomy on GEM Nexus and use the Glossary.
GEM Building Taxonomy
- Click here for the overview table of the GEM Building Taxonomy (V2). From here you can click on to the 13 sub-tables and the Glossary for definitions of each characteristic.
- Click here for the latest (draft) report of the GEM Building Taxonomy.
- Download the TaxT tool from the sidebar to immediately work with the Building Taxonomy
GEM Building Taxonomy Glossary
- Click here for the main page of the Glossary providing access to 380 definitions
How can I contribute?
- Create and share Building Reports of buildings near you
- Provide feedback on the latest version of the GEM Building Taxonomy Report
- Provide feedback on Glossary definitions
- Send in photos and other illustrations to improve the Glossary
Ready to contribute?
To contribute to the GEM Building Taxonomy read the Photo Contribution Guideline and follow these simple instructions.
Who have contributed so far?
GEM-EERI Building Reports
Afghanistan |
Amit Kumar |
Pakistan |
Jitendra Bothara |
Algeria |
Saliha Aitmesbah |
|
|
|
Mohammed Farsi |
|
Raja Saeed |
Argentina |
Francisco Crisafulli |
|
Najia Siddiqui |
Barbedos |
Greg Parris |
Peru |
Nicole Tarque |
Bhutan |
Dago Zangmo |
Portugal |
Rita Bento |
Brasil |
Wallace Novaes |
|
Tiago Ferreira |
Bulgaria |
Manya Deyanova
|
|
Mário Marques
|
Canada
|
Svetlana Brzev |
|
Vitor Silva |
Central Asia
|
EMCA-group |
|
Mauro Monteiro |
Chile |
Maximiliano Astroza |
|
J.A.R Mendes da Silva |
|
Gian Carlo Giuliano |
|
Ana Simões |
|
Ofelia Moroni |
|
Carlos Sousa Oliveira |
China |
Grace Fok |
|
Humberto Varum |
|
Baitao Sun |
|
Romeu Vicente |
Colombia |
Seku Catacoli |
Romania |
Maria Bostenaru |
Ethiopia |
Bezabeh |
|
Istvan Demeter |
Germany |
Maria Bostenaru |
|
Mihai-Gabrie Voinescu |
|
Anselm Smolka |
Saudi Arabia |
Ali Altheeb |
Ghana |
Carlien Bou-Chedid |
Singapore |
Simon Simpson |
Greece |
Antonios Pomonis |
Slovenia |
Marjana Lutman |
|
Kostas Holevas |
Spain |
Elisa Entrena |
Haiti |
Tim Hart |
|
Mercedes Feriche |
|
Abe Lynn |
|
Federico Salmerón |
Hungary |
Maria Bostenaru |
Switzerland |
Maria Bostenaru |
India |
Tanmay Dey |
|
Tom Schacher |
|
Hemant B. Kaushik |
Tajikistan |
Pulat Yasunov |
|
BS |
|
Jafar Niyazov |
Indonesia |
Jitendra Bothara |
Thailand |
Chitr Lilavivat |
|
Hendri Muljanto |
Trinidad & Tobago |
Anthony Farrell |
|
Sugeng Wijanto |
Turkmenistan |
Bayramov Sadiy |
|
Simon Simpson |
|
Nodir Utashev |
Iran |
A.S. Moghadam |
Uganda |
Eric Lehmkuhl |
|
Farhad Homayoun Shad |
United Kingdom |
Andre Gibbs |
|
M. Yekrangnia |
United States |
|
Ireland |
Julie Clarke |
|
Lauren Doyel |
Italy |
Giuseppe Barberio |
|
Jeff Falero |
|
Prevosti |
|
Michael Germeraad |
|
Gianalberto Vecchi |
|
Sandra Hyde |
Jamaica |
Alfrico Adams |
|
David Merrick |
Japan |
Charles Scawthorn |
|
Richard Nielsen |
Kenya |
Kishor Jaiswal |
|
Kyle Steuck |
Kyrgystan |
InTUIT team |
|
Scott Tinker |
Malawi |
Mauro Sassu |
Venezuela |
Juan Carlos Vielma Pérez |
Mexico |
Rene Martinez-Leon |
|
|
|
Roberto Arroyo Matus |
|
|
Nepal |
Jitendra Bothara |
|
|
|
Hemchandra Chaulagain |
|
|
|
Prachand Man Pradhan |
|
|
New Zealand |
Jitendra Bothara |
|
|
Glossary Images
Tom Abbuhl (Canada) |
B.A. Bakshi (Iran) |
Andrea Benedetti (Italy) |
Ben Benjamin (Haiti) |
Marcial Blondet (Peru) |
Jitendra Bothara (Indonesia, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan) |
Win Clark (New Zealand) |
Mohammed Farsi (Algeria) |
M.A.Ghanad (Iran) |
Amit Kumar (Afghanistan) |
Sarosh H.Lodi (Pakistan) |
A.Mahdizadeh (Iran) |
Sinisa Mihaldzic (Chile) |
Maria Ofelia Moroni Yadlin (Chile) |
Farzad Naeim (Iran) |
Nebojsa Ojdrovic (Canada) |
Muhammad Masood Rafi (Pakistan) |
Antonis Pomonis (Cyprus, Greece) |
Keith Porter (Nepal) |
Durgesh Rai (India) |
Vivek Rawal (India) |
Tom Schacher (Switzerland) |
Martijn Schildkamp (Nepal) |
Ljubisav Stamenic (Canada, Germany, United Kingdom) |
Nicola Tarque (Peru) |
Many thanks to all!