This site is old and the information may be incorrect. Please check the new website here

Active Faults DB

How is it of relevance?

The knowledge of fault positions and current activity is of vital knowledge for the calculation of seismic hazard. The current state of the art only consists of a number of national and regional databases that are compiled according to different criteria and parameters. The first version of this database therefore is a unified database that is capable of incorporating information from different sources and formats. It is accompanied by a tool for capture of new data, so that the database can continue to compile faults from around the globe.

Who is developing the database?

Kelvin Berryman, Annemarie Christophersen and Nicola Litchfield with their colleagues from GNS Science are the driving force behind this project. Kerry Sieh from EOS Singapore and Ross Stein from the USGS have played an important role, as have renowned geologists from around the globe, including Carlos Costa, Roberto Basili, Kathy Haller, Richard Koehler, Toshikazu Yoshioka, Dan Clark, Ned Field, Gavin Hayes, Margaret Boetcher, and Bob Yeats have contributed.

Regional collaboration has been an important component during the project. Regional workshops were in Thailand (November 2012) and in Mexico (April 2013)..

GEM’s Model Facility has been developing the fault data capture tool, in collaboration with the geologists from GNS.

The Database

A database structure is currently in place that allows importing (rich) existing databases (such as the active fault datasets from the United States and New Zealand). New discoveries and data can be uploaded to the database after review, by using the active fault data capture tool.

Contents Version 1

The first version of the database (2014) will contain the following datasets:

In addition data from global subduction interfaces have been compiled as well as the Himalaya Frontal thrust. .

The Fault Capture Tool

The fault capture tool is a comprehensive tool that allows geologists to add new discoveries in an interactive way to the OpenQuake platform, allowing drawing the fault directly in the tool, as well as by adding detailed information on the fault. All data can subsequently be saved and used by the geologist and can be submitted for review, so that after validation it can be included in the database.

click to learn more

click to learn more


Several workshops have been organised so far, one is planned for Mexico from 9-12 April 2013 and others are possible, given regional interest.

9-12 April 2013: Central America Regional Fault Workshop

The UNAM (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico), Centro de Geociencias de Juriquilla, hosted the workshop, which was held at their campus in Juriquilla, Querétaro from 9 to 12 April 2013.  The local organiser was Ramón Zúñiga. UNAM-CGEO also provided IT support, some stationary material and coffee breaks.  Pilar Villamor and Robert Langridge from GNS Science, together with Ramón Zúñiga, led the workshop. UNAM-CGEO also organised and led a one-day field trip to visit a paleoseismic trench opened across one of the active faults in the Trans Mexican Volcanic Belt.   31 participants from eight countries attended the Central America workshop.

12-21 November 2012: Asia-Pacific Regional Fault Workshop

The GEM Active Faults team, Regional Integrated Multi-Hazard Early Warning System (RIMES), and Asian Institute of Technology (AIT) organised a 3-day regional workshop for fault experts in South-East/Asia and the Pacific, which was led by Teraphan Ornthammarath from RIMES, Pilar Villamor from GNS Science and Nick Horspool from Geoscience Australia.
In total 26 geologists and other experts from 9 countries throughout the region participated in the workshop; the participants represented knowledge from Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Myanmar, Singapore, Vietnam, Papua New Guinea, Australia and New Zealand.

The workshop discussed the database, developments in the region on faults and fault discovery, the data included so far for the region. Collaboration on faults worldwide and in the area was discussed during the workshop. The fault data capture tool was demonstrated and explained, to allow participants to see how they can use it in their future work, and for them to provide feedback for further improvement of the tool.

18-21 September 2011: Subduction Interface Workshop

18 participants from eight countries worked intensively for four days at the USGS in Menlo Park, co-hosted by Kelvin Berryman and Ross Stein (GEM Scientific Board), and organized by Nicola Litchfield and Laura Wallace. An evening paella cooking class ice-breaker and a USGS BBQ closer also gave the participants a chance to catch our breath and enjoy each other during the meeting. 

In the wake of the past decade's great megathrust events in Sumatra, Chile, and Japan, GEM Faulted Earth sought to capture the geometry and seismic properties of all 40,000 km of subduction zones for its active fault inventory. Neither the Andaman nor the Japan trench were thought to be capable of producing a shock similar to M9, and so the group wanted to take a fresh and synpotic view of megathrust behavior, strongly influenced by the work of Peter Bird, Gavin Hayes, Kelan Wang, Thorne Lay, and Rob McCaffrey and Yan Kagan (through their papers). 

Some subduction zones, such as the Marianas, are widely thought to be seismically incapable of M>=8 shocks, but this view is now being justifiably questioned, and instead the earthquake record may simply be too short. GEM Faulted Earth will use Gavin Hayes' SLAB 1.0 for the subduction geometry and rake, but will take a logic-tree approach to populating the megathrusts with earthquakes. Some weight will be given to a M>=9 shock on all subduction zones (with the magnitude limited only by the total length and width of contiguous zones), but also some to alternatives that use the seismic coupling and 'soft' segment boundaries (boundaries to most but not all shocks) where such data is available. Marco Pagani, GEM’s Hazard Coordinator, guided us on how the OpenQuake software will digest our data, and also reflected on how best to modify or augment OpenQuake to best reflect the diversity and uncertainty of our knowledge, and its enormous impact on hazard.

How can I use the database and the tool?

The database is currently being tested against a number of the most advanced national inventories of faults from around the globe. The tool for new data compilation is also being tested and evaluated by regional communities so as to make it as much as possible tailored to the needs of geologists worldwide.

Both the database and the tool will be available in the OpenQuake Platform and can be used interactively from 2014. There will also be a guideline available for geologists for using the tool. A data dictionary will furthermore facilitate use of both database and tool.


You can already download and comment on the document that reports on existing fault databases worldwide, their possibilities and limitations that we posted in GEM Nexus:


How can I contribute?

  • We are keen to hear from geologists worldwide to see how we can collaborate on the database
  • We are always interested in receiving feedback from organisations and individuals that are working on active faults
  • If you have other ideas or questions, feel free to get in touch as well

Contact us through Annemarie Christophersen:


Robert Yeat's book

Providing the first worldwide survey of active earthquake faults, this book focuses on those described as 'seismic time bombs' – with the potential to destroy large cities in the developing world such as Port au Prince, Kabul, Tehran and Caracas. The development of the book was funded by GEM, to contribute to knowledge sharing on earthquake faults worldwide.